Hubungan Khotbah Pekabaran Injil Dengan Pertumbuhan Anggaran Misi Pekabaran Injil Di Calvary Life Fellowship Lippo Karawaci Tangerang

Abstract

Abstrak

Penelitian ini tentang Hubungan Khotbah Pekabaran Inji dengan Pertumbuhan Anggaran Misi Pekabaran Injil di Calvary Life Fellowship Lippo Karawaci Tangerang. Dengan menggunakan metode kuantitatif, maka ditemukan beberapa hasil penelitian yang diuraikan sebagai berikut. Hasil penelitian tentang “Hubungan Khotbah Pekabaran Inji dengan Pertumbuhan Anggaran Misi Pekabaran Injil di Calvary Life Fellowship Lippo Karawaci Tangerang” di mana hipotesis kerja (H₁) diterima memiliki dua pengertian, pertama, bahwa teori yang dibangun oleh peneliti yang tergambar dalam pernyataan/pertanyaan dalam kuisioner sesuai dengan realitas, yang berarti ada Hubungan antara konsep-konsep dan pemikiran-pemikiran dengan fakta di lokasi penelitian. Kedua, bahwa H₁ diterima sebagai gambaran bahwa teori yang dibangun signifikan dipahami dan disetujui oleh mayoritas responden di lokasi penelitian namun bukan berarti sesuai dengan relitas di lokasi penelitian.

Abstract:

This research is about the Relationship of Preaching Sermons with the Growth of Evangelism Mission Budget at Calvary Life Fellowship Lippo Karawaci Tangerang. By using quantitative methods, several research results were found which are described as follows. The results of research on “The Relationship between Inji's Preaching Sermons and the Growth of the Evangelistic Mission Budget at Calvary Life Fellowship Lippo Karawaci Tangerang” where the working hypothesis (H1) is accepted have two meanings, first, that the theory built by the researcher which is reflected in the statements/questions in the questionnaire is in accordance with reality, which means that there is a relationship between concepts and thoughts with the facts at the research location. second, that H1 is accepted as a description of the relationship between concepts and thoughts and the facts at the research location. Secondly, that H1 is accepted as an illustration that the theory built is significantly understood and agreed upon by the majority of respondents at the research location but does not mean that it is in accordance with the reality at the research location.